{"id":572,"date":"2021-10-25T20:50:34","date_gmt":"2021-10-25T20:50:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/?p=572"},"modified":"2021-10-25T20:50:34","modified_gmt":"2021-10-25T20:50:34","slug":"california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/","title":{"rendered":"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>By William Espinosa<\/h3>\n<p><strong><em>California Association of Health Plans v. Mary Watanabe, et al., <\/em>Case No. 20STCP03773 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles County)<\/strong>. On May 5, 2021, after full consideration of the arguments and evidence presented at trial by Petitioner California Association of Health Plans (\u201cCAHP\u201d) and Respondents Mary Watanabe and the California Department of Managed Health Care (collectively, \u201cDMHC\u201d) relative to section 1300.76.01, subdivision (d), Title 28 of the CCR, and having entered its April 13, 2021 <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1TjDpD9YsiWw9tP85lBFXEn82tgGh6MW3\/view?usp=sharing\">order<\/a> finding Respondents failed to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, the Court entered <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1FKylTQw2xFIdb7NezfG4agg11tedc6oJ\/view?usp=sharing\">judgment<\/a> finding that DMHC failed to comply with the California Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when promulgating the relevant emergency regulation (subdivision (d)).<\/p>\n<p>Section 1300.67.01, Title 28 of the CCR, the regulation in dispute, was enacted by DMHC on July 17, 2020, as an emergency regulation without notice, public comment period, or public hearing. Among other changes, subdivision (c), the Coverage Mandate, of the regulation required that all COVID-19 tests for essential workers be covered by health plans as a medically necessary basic health care service regardless of a lack of symptoms or potential exposure. Subdivision (d) of the regulation prohibited health care plans from relying on previously negotiated contracts with their health care providers to allocate the costs of COVID-19 testing provided under the Coverage Mandate. Rather, health care plans were to renegotiate the allocation of such costs with the health care providers. According to the Court\u2019s April 13th order, DMHC stated that this subdivision was necessary, as the enactment of the Coverage Mandate would lead to confusion as to who would cover the cost of testing, which would then lead to confusion as to when and how enrollees could be tested for COVID-19.<\/p>\n<p>On November 13, 2020, the California Association of Health Plans (CAHP) <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1tT4nsKCLs9QQ9Z4AkRWAu5VMXIJPw3Rg\/view?usp=sharing\">petitioned<\/a> for a writ of prohibition, mandamus, or judicial declaration \u201cdirecting [DMHC] from enforcing [Subdivision (d)] as it was . . . enacted in violation of [the APA] and California Constitution.\u201d CAHP focused on subdivision (d), asserting that DMHC did not make an emergency finding sufficient to waive the minimum of five-day notice, public comment period, or public hearing as required by the APA.\u00a0 CAHP did not dispute the Coverage Mandate.<\/p>\n<p>On April 13, 2021, the Court ruled that the DMHC\u2019s enactment of subdivision (d) did not comply with the APA requirement that the DMHC\u2019s emergency addressed by their regulation \u2018\u201cclearly poses . . . an immediate, serious harm that delaying action to allow public comment would be inconsistent with the public interest.\u2019\u201d The Court allowed for each subdivision of the regulation to be reviewed individually. The Court then noted that there \u201cmust be some sufficient relationship between the emergency and <em>both<\/em> the Coverage Mandate and Subdivision (d) to justify an adoption of the [specific] rule without public notice and comment.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Court rejected that there may be a connection between who was to pay for COVID-19 testing and easy access to testing by the public, stating that \u201c[s]ubdivision (d) could only conceivably address any confusion that might have been generated between the health care providers and the health care plans over financial allocation.\u201d The Court further stated that DMHC did not have evidence that there was any confusion between health care plans and health care providers about the allocation of costs for COVID-19 testing under their capitated contracts, and they did not have evidence that such confusion occurring would prevent the testing of essential workers in the first place. DMHC had, therefore, failed to demonstrate that there was an emergency that could justify the enacting of subdivision (d) without any notice period, and the Court held that subdivision (d) was invalid.<\/p>\n<p>On March 8, 2021, the parties stipulated that the action be bifurcated for trial into two phases, with Trial Phase 1 limited to whether DMHC\u2019s promulgation of subdivision (d) on an emergency basis complied with the APA and Trial Phase 2 addressing all remaining issues. On April 29, 2021, the parties further stipulated that Trial Phase 2 was unnecessary as a result of the Court\u2019s April 13, 2021 order, and that judgment in the action be entered in Petitioner\u2019s favor. These stipulations became part of the Court\u2019s May 5, 2021 judgment and conclude this matter.<\/p>\n<a class=\"synved-social-button synved-social-button-follow synved-social-size-32 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-facebook nolightbox\" data-provider=\"facebook\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" title=\"Follow us on Facebook\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CPILUSD\" style=\"font-size: 0px;width:32px;height:32px;margin:0;margin-bottom:5px;margin-right:5px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Facebook\" title=\"Follow us on Facebook\" class=\"synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-follow\" width=\"32\" height=\"32\" style=\"display: inline;width:32px;height:32px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/social-media-feather\/synved-social\/addons\/extra-icons\/image\/social\/circle\/64x64\/facebook.png\" \/><\/a><a class=\"synved-social-button synved-social-button-follow synved-social-size-32 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-twitter nolightbox\" data-provider=\"twitter\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" title=\"Follow us on Twitter\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/cpilusd\" style=\"font-size: 0px;width:32px;height:32px;margin:0;margin-bottom:5px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"twitter\" title=\"Follow us on Twitter\" class=\"synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-follow\" width=\"32\" height=\"32\" style=\"display: inline;width:32px;height:32px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/social-media-feather\/synved-social\/addons\/extra-icons\/image\/social\/circle\/64x64\/twitter.png\" \/><\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By William Espinosa California Association of Health Plans v. Mary Watanabe, et al., Case No. 20STCP03773 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles County). On May 5, 2021, after full consideration of the arguments and evidence presented at trial by Petitioner California Association <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1013,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[132906,136754],"tags":[137853,132908,132930,134395,9922,132860],"coauthors":[132864],"class_list":["post-572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-department-of-managed-health-care","category-litigation-department-of-managed-health-care","tag-cahp","tag-dmhc","tag-emergency-regulation","tag-health-care","tag-litigation","tag-rulemaking"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper - Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper - Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By William Espinosa California Association of Health Plans v. Mary Watanabe, et al., Case No. 20STCP03773 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles County). On May 5, 2021, after full consideration of the arguments and evidence presented at trial by Petitioner California Association Continue reading &rarr;\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-25T20:50:34+00:00\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Katie Gonzalez\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Katie Gonzalez\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" class=\"yoast-seo-meta-tag\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Katie Gonzalez\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fdc87a266320b80c7a790bdc2a17df69\"},\"headline\":\"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-25T20:50:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\"},\"wordCount\":691,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"CAHP\",\"DMHC\",\"emergency regulation\",\"health care\",\"Litigation\",\"Rulemaking\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Department of Managed Health Care\",\"Litigation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\",\"name\":\"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper - Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-25T20:50:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fdc87a266320b80c7a790bdc2a17df69\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog\",\"description\":\"We work to protect and advance a reality where every citizen is protected by a government that is ethical, accountable, and transparent.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fdc87a266320b80c7a790bdc2a17df69\",\"name\":\"Katie Gonzalez\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/367bf8ae36ed938af8637f2b96d85412?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mmc97f81d333fa3b469936c6ead32ef1d5\",\"url\":\"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/367bf8ae36ed938af8637f2b96d85412?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/367bf8ae36ed938af8637f2b96d85412?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"Katie Gonzalez\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/author\/katie-gonzalez_gonzalez\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper - Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper - Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog","og_description":"By William Espinosa California Association of Health Plans v. Mary Watanabe, et al., Case No. 20STCP03773 (Super. Ct., Los Angeles County). On May 5, 2021, after full consideration of the arguments and evidence presented at trial by Petitioner California Association Continue reading &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/","og_site_name":"Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog","article_published_time":"2021-10-25T20:50:34+00:00","author":"Katie Gonzalez","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Katie Gonzalez","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/"},"author":{"name":"Katie Gonzalez","@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fdc87a266320b80c7a790bdc2a17df69"},"headline":"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper","datePublished":"2021-10-25T20:50:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/"},"wordCount":691,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["CAHP","DMHC","emergency regulation","health care","Litigation","Rulemaking"],"articleSection":["Department of Managed Health Care","Litigation"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/","url":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/","name":"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper - Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-10-25T20:50:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fdc87a266320b80c7a790bdc2a17df69"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/2021\/10\/25\/california-covid-19-emergency-testing-regulations-imposed-by-dmhc-without-notice-ruled-improper\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"California COVID-19 Emergency Testing Regulations Imposed By DMHC without Notice Ruled Improper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/","name":"Consumer Protection Policy Center - Blog","description":"We work to protect and advance a reality where every citizen is protected by a government that is ethical, accountable, and transparent.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/fdc87a266320b80c7a790bdc2a17df69","name":"Katie Gonzalez","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/367bf8ae36ed938af8637f2b96d85412?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mmc97f81d333fa3b469936c6ead32ef1d5","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/367bf8ae36ed938af8637f2b96d85412?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/367bf8ae36ed938af8637f2b96d85412?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"Katie Gonzalez"},"url":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/author\/katie-gonzalez_gonzalez\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1013"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=572"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":573,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572\/revisions\/573"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=572"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.sandiego.edu\/cpil-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}